Aerated concrete block disadvantages

Written by g.d. palmer | 13/05/2017
Aerated concrete block disadvantages
Conventional concrete can withstand stress more effectively than AAC. (concrete wall image by bayu harsa from

Aerated concrete block, also referred to as autoclaved aerated concrete or AAC, is an innovative type of concrete containing around 80 per cent air. These special concrete blocks have a number of advantages: They're strong, light and provide better sound and thermal insulation than conventional blocks. However, like any other building material, aerated concrete block also has its problems.


Buildings close to AAC production facilities benefit from short transportation and minimal shipping costs, especially since this concrete's lighter weight makes it easier to transport than regular concrete. However, AAC itself has an initial cost per unit higher than ordinary concrete. In addition, the small number of manufacturing facilities in the UK could make using AAC very expensive for projects where the material must travel long distances from a manufacturer.

Strength limitations

AAC is strong enough to use for structural parts of a building, but isn't as strong as conventional concrete. According to the Portland Cement Association, autoclaved aerated concrete has an allowable shear stress of 55 to 152 kpa (8 to 22 psi), and a compressive strength of 2,068 to 6,205 mpa (300 to 900 psi). Conventional concrete has an shear stress closer to 276 kpa (40 psi), with a compressive strength of 10,342 kpa (1500 psi).


While AAC blocks are commonly used in Scandinavian buildings, they aren't as common in the UK. Existing building regulations compiled with regular concrete block in mind may not be compatible with AAC blocks. Homeowners who wish to build with AAC may need to get special permission. Many contractors are also unfamiliar with AAC, and are unused to the special thin-set mortar required to lay it.


AAC blocks use less material than conventional concrete block, making them more environmentally friendly. However, AAC may not be the greenest material for a given project. The autoclaving process requires significant amounts of energy. AAC is lighter and uses less resources to transport than ordinary concrete block, but is still heavier than many other materials. Depending on the project location, AAC could increase its carbon footprint over one built with locally available supplies.


Since the UK has so few AAC manufacturers, this material can be hard to obtain. Homeowners who wish to use AAC may need to contact the manufacturer directly, or pay a premium to acquire this building material.

By using the site, you consent to the use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie policy.