We Value Your Privacy

We and our partners use technology such as cookies on our site to personalise content and ads, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web. You can change your mind and change your consent choices at anytime by returning to this site.

Update Consent
Loading ...

How to calculate flux density

Flux density can be illustrated the density per unit area of lines of magnetic force. Higher magnetic flux density corresponds to more closely spaced lines of force. Magnet geometry affects relevant variables and equation used to calculate flux density. The air gap, or distance, refers to distance from magnet surface at which flux density is measured. Formula and calculation for a rod-shaped magnet incorporate magnet radius, thickness, and air gap.

Loading ...
  1. Incorporate magnet geometry. MagneticSolution's “Flux Density Formulae” points out a consistent theme—length (L), width (W), and thickness (T) affect magnetic flux. If the magnet has a circular component, then magnet radius (R) also comes into play. Magnetic lines of force that are close together correspond to higher flux density. If magnet geometry more easily allows more spacing between magnetic lines of force, magnetic flux intensity will drop off quicker with increasing distance.

  2. Factor in the air gap. Flux density can be some distance away from the magnet, or at the magnet surface. If at the surface, distance (x) is zero, x = 0. This can simplify calculations. Magnetic flux density tends to decrease as air gap increases.

  3. Program or write out the formula for specific magnet geometry. For example, the formula for a single steel-backed rod magnet can be broken down in terms of geometric variables. Rod magnet radius and thickness are relevant in flux density calculations. Note that rod length does not affect flux density calculation. Due to formula complexity, secondary substitution is necessary. Australian Magnetic Solutions has a list of flux density formulas. A single magnetic rod with specified radius (R) and thickness (T) has flux density distance x from the magnet’s axis. The following equation describes this flux density:

  4. B = (Br/2) * ([A/C] – [x/B]). A = x + 2T, B = sqrt(R^2 + x^2), C = sqrt(R^2 + A^2).

  5. The “Br” is the magnetic flux constant. Br relates to field strength within the magnet substance. Obviously, a weak magnet gives less outside flux density than a strong magnet with the same geometry and distance.

  6. This formula is innately complex and difficult to express in text format without secondary substitution such as “A = x+2T.”

  7. Use the previous equation to calculate flux density with hypothetical numbers substituted into the equation. Assume that the following values are given:

  8. Br = 2kg

  9. R = 6.0cm, T = 0.5cm, x = 3.0mm

  10. First, we convert 2kg (two kilogauss) into standard gauss units: 2 kG = 2000 Gauss (2000 G).

  11. Next, make all length units the same. Express x in centimetres (cm) as x = 0.3cm.

  12. Calculate A = x + 2T = 0.3 + (2*0.5) = 0.3 + 1 = 1.3 cm

  13. Similarly, calculate B = sqrt(6^2 + 0.3^2) = sqrt(36 + 0.09) = sqrt(36.09) = 6.007cm

  14. Find C, C = sqrt(6^2 + 1.3^2) = sqrt(36 + 1.69) = sqrt(37.69) = 6.139cm

  15. Substitute A, B, C, and Br values into overall formula:

  16. B = (2000/2) * ((1.3/6.139) – (0.3/6.007)) = 1000 * (0.2117 – 0.04994) = 161.76 Gauss.

  17. Tip

    In this example, significant digits were not considered. In real life situations, precision limits and significant digits would affect the final answer. For instance, the value 161.76 Gauss would be rounded to either 161.8 or 162 (or 160), depending on precision of the measuring and calculating devices.

Loading ...

Things You'll Need

  • Calculator with exponent capacity
  • Magnet and magnet dimension data
  • Air gap distance data

About the Author

I am applying to be an Expert focusing on sci/tech/economic topics. The above "blog" link was my overall blog. From it, I would like to highlight some choice entries reviewing Ian Stewart's "Flatterland", a response and "supplement" to Edwin Abbott's classic "Flatland -- A Romance Of Many Dimensions" 1. http://numbersandpatterns.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/flatterland-review-1/ 2. http://numbersandpatterns.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/flatterland-review-2/ 3. http://numbersandpatterns.wordpress.com/2009/07/24/flatterland-review-2-5-fractal-afterthought/ 4. http://numbersandpatterns.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/flatterland-review-3/

Loading ...