Theories of Sports Leadership

Written by matt hebberd | 13/05/2017
Theories of Sports Leadership
A coach's leadership is key to a team's success. (Jupiterimages/ Images)

Sports bring individuals together in athleticism to achieve common goals. Despite mantras saying that "simply playing" is what counts, the undeniable goal of all sports competitors is to win. Despite skills and talents of individuals, an important part of the puzzle in achieving success in sports is the leadership of the coach or manager in bringing those individuals together into a team. Two models of sport leadership help lead a team to success.

Task-Oriented Leadership

Theories of Sports Leadership
Some coaches are focused on results and task completion. (Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images Sport/Getty Images)

An autocratic coach believes in a one-way line of communication, says Dr. Rick McGuire, a track coach and sports psychologist at the University of Missouri -- Columbia. This type of coach, who demands the ultimate authority over his team, many times employs a "my way or the highway" approach to communicating with the team, McGuire says. Coaches who follow this leadership style may give the team an opportunity to communicate their concerns or ideas, but the autocratic coach is focused on the task at hand. These coaches rarely put an individual's need over the goal.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Theories of Sports Leadership
Some players may resist an authoritative coach. (Polka Dot Images/Polka Dot/Getty Images)

The benefits to the autocratic leadership include focused energy on task completion and less "wasted" time during training or practicing. But as athletes become older and more experienced, the autocratic model can break down if they can question the coach's tactics. Additionally, in an autocratic system, critical trust and decision-making skills of the athletes may be compromised over time.

People-Oriented Leadership

Theories of Sports Leadership
(Jupiterimages/Brand X Pictures/Getty Images)

A democratic coach encourages the free-flow of ideas between coach and athlete(s). The coach believes that the athletes have an equal say in team matters, McGuire says. Most decisions are made by a majority vote. This leadership style allows for athlete input to the team's goals, practice techniques and models, as well as game strategy and tactics. The coach believes everyone plays a role in the team's direction and success.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The advantage of the democratic style is that the coach can build trust and reduce anxiety during a competition. A democratic coach can also build self-confidence in his athletes by giving them decision-making abilities, says Scott Mergelsberg, a basketball coach and coaching education writer. The focus of the democratic coach, he indicates, is to develop character and understanding among his players. A disadvantage of the democratic method, however, is the coach can foster a lack of concern amongst the players because of a lack of culpability. Additionally, many younger athletes thrive in a situation where the lines of authority are clear, McGuire says.

  • All types
  • Articles
  • Slideshows
  • Videos
  • Most relevant
  • Most popular
  • Most recent

No articles available

No slideshows available

No videos available

By using the site, you consent to the use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie policy.